What Is The Difference Between Possession Of CDS And Possession Of CDS With The Intent To Distribute?
There is no “bright line” rule on the difference between Possession and Possession with intent. The inquiry, and the result, depend on an analysis of factors.
The relevant criteria are the amounts involved and the coterminous presence of other “tools” of the narcotics trade.
Both crimes involve having, being near, or otherwise being in control of contraband, specifically, narcotics or other controlled dangerous substances [CDS], the possession of which is prohibited by Maryland law. It’s no secret that the crime of possession with intent to distribute narcotics is treated considerably more harshly than what is sometimes called “simple” possession. The possible sentences escalate quickly from 1 year for “simple” possession, to 5 or more years if an intent to distribute is proven.
There are two ways one can possess an item. Actual possession is shown where a person has actual physical control of an object, As Attorney Eric T. Kirk will tell you.
- to have it in one’s hand
- to have it in one’s pocket
- in a purse
- in a wallet
Maryland law provides that constructive possession is demonstrated when one exerts sufficient dominion and control over an object, so as to be said to possess it, even though they don’t actually have it on or about their person. A person who has both the ability and intent to exert control of an item is said to constructively possess it, even if it is not in their actual possession. In determining whether or not an item of CDS is or has been constructively possessed, courts have looked looks to a number of factors:
- the physical distance between the individual and the item
- if found in the individual’s house or car, and,
- the mutual use and enjoyment of contraband
So, what is the difference then between simply possessing contraband, drugs or CDS and possessing them with the intent to distribute. Jurors are instructed that there is no “magic” amount over which an intent to distribute must be found. Rather each case is to me be judged on the particular facts and circumstances attendant to it. Courts have looked to things such as:
- Quantity
- Presence of paraphernalia
- Conduct consistent with transfer to another
- Scales or other packaging equipment
- Contemporaneous possession of a lot of cash
in determining if a person had an intent to distribute, or simply had the plan to consume the CDS themselves.
I extend a no-cost, no-obligation case analysis and personal, confidential conference and strategy session to all prospective clients. If you have been accused of a crime, it is vital that you act quickly to safeguard your freedom. Contact me today. 410 591 2835, or simply complete the online form at the bottom of the page.
- Baltimore Personal Injury Trial Lawyer Eric T. Kirk
- Legal Analysis & Case Studies
- Baltimore Neighborhoods I Serve
A Baltimore car accident and personal injury litigator who has taken hundreds of cases to trial in Maryland, New York and Florida, recovering millions over a 30-year mission to obtain denied compensation for his clients.
